React Hooks Testing Library
Edit page
IntroductionInstallation
Usage
Basic HooksRenderingUpdatesProviding PropsAdvanced HooksServer-Side Rendering
API Reference

Basic Hooks

Rendering

Imagine we have a simple hook that we want to test:

import { useState, useCallback } from 'react'
export default function useCounter() {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0)
const increment = useCallback(() => setCount((x) => x + 1), [])
return { count, increment }
}

To test useCounter we need to render it using the renderHook function provided by react-hooks-testing-library:

import { renderHook } from '@testing-library/react-hooks'
import useCounter from './useCounter'
test('should use counter', () => {
const { result } = renderHook(() => useCounter())
expect(result.current.count).toBe(0)
expect(typeof result.current.increment).toBe('function')
})

As you can see, the result's current value matches what is returned by our hook.

Updates

The test shown above is great and all, but it doesn't actually test what we want to use the counter for, i.e. counting. We can easily improve this test by calling the increment function and checking that the count value increases:

import { renderHook, act } from '@testing-library/react-hooks'
import useCounter from './useCounter'
test('should increment counter', () => {
const { result } = renderHook(() => useCounter())
act(() => {
result.current.increment()
})
expect(result.current.count).toBe(1)
})

After increment is called, the current count value now reflects the new value returned by our hook.

You may have also noticed that we also wrapped the increment call in act. This utility simulates how our hook will act in a browser, allowing us to update the values within it. For more details on act, please see the React documentation.

NOTE: There's a gotcha with updates. renderHook mutates the value of current when updates happen so you cannot destructure its values as the assignment will make a copy locking into the value at that time.

Providing Props

Sometimes a hook relies on the props passed to it in order to do its thing. For example the useCounter hook could easily accept the initial value of the counter as a prop:

import { useState, useCallback } from 'react'
export default function useCounter(initialValue = 0) {
const [count, setCount] = useState(initialValue)
const increment = useCallback(() => setCount((x) => x + 1), [])
return { count, increment }
}

Setting the initialValue prop in our test is as easy as calling the hook with the value we want to use:

import { renderHook, act } from '@testing-library/react-hooks'
import useCounter from './useCounter'
test('should increment counter from custom initial value', () => {
const { result } = renderHook(() => useCounter(9000))
act(() => {
result.current.increment()
})
expect(result.current.count).toBe(9001)
})

Props

Many of the hook primitives use an array of dependent values to determine when to perform specific actions, such as recalculating an expensive value or running an effect. If we extend our useCounter hook to have a reset function that resets the value to the initialValue it might look something like this:

import { useState, useCallback } from 'react'
export default function useCounter(initialValue = 0) {
const [count, setCount] = useState(initialValue)
const increment = useCallback(() => setCount((x) => x + 1), [])
const reset = useCallback(() => setCount(initialValue), [initialValue])
return { count, increment, reset }
}

Now, the only time the reset function will be updated is if initialValue changes. The most basic way to handle changing the input props of our hook in a test is to simply update the value in a variable and rerender the hook:

import { renderHook, act } from '@testing-library/react-hooks'
import useCounter from './useCounter'
test('should reset counter to updated initial value', () => {
let initialValue = 0
const { result, rerender } = renderHook(() => useCounter(initialValue))
initialValue = 10
rerender()
act(() => {
result.current.reset()
})
expect(result.current.count).toBe(10)
})

This is fine, but if there are lots of props, it can become a bit difficult to have variables to keep track of them all. Another option is to use the initialProps option and newProps of rerender:

import { renderHook, act } from '@testing-library/react-hooks'
import useCounter from './useCounter'
test('should reset counter to updated initial value', () => {
const { result, rerender } = renderHook(({ initialValue }) => useCounter(initialValue), {
initialProps: { initialValue: 0 }
})
rerender({ initialValue: 10 })
act(() => {
result.current.reset()
})
expect(result.current.count).toBe(10)
})

Another case where this is useful is when you want to limit the scope of the variables being closed over to just be inside the hook callback. The following (contrived) example fails because the id value changes for both the setup and cleanup of the useEffect call:

import { useEffect } from 'react'
import { renderHook } from '@testing-library/react-hooks'
import sideEffect from './sideEffect'
test('should clean up side effect', () => {
let id = 'first'
const { rerender } = renderHook(() => {
useEffect(() => {
sideEffect.start(id)
return () => {
sideEffect.stop(id) // this id will get the new value when the effect is cleaned up
}
}, [id])
})
id = 'second'
rerender()
expect(sideEffect.get('first')).toBe(false)
expect(sideEffect.get('second')).toBe(true)
})

By using the initialProps and newProps the captured id value from the first render is used to clean up the effect, allowing the test to pass as expected:

import { useEffect } from 'react'
import { renderHook } from '@testing-library/react-hooks'
import sideEffect from './sideEffect'
test('should clean up side effect', () => {
const { rerender } = renderHook(
({ id }) => {
useEffect(() => {
sideEffect.start(id)
return () => {
sideEffect.stop(id) // this id will get the old value when the effect is cleaned up
}
}, [id])
},
{
initialProps: { id: 'first' }
}
)
rerender({ id: 'second' })
expect(sideEffect.get('first')).toBe(false)
expect(sideEffect.get('second')).toBe(true)
})

This is a fairly obscure case, so pick the method that fits best for you and your test.